Minimodule and Model Reality Check Sustaining Fisheries
Author: Thomas J. Pfaff and Paul J. Campbell
Consider a stock of fish. If there is no harvest, the stock will tend to renew
itself with births and deaths: It will arrive at more or less the same
level of biomass each year-with variation due to climate and weather
variability, and assuming that other variables remain constant, such as
food and predation.
The initial growth of such a population is commonly modeled as logistic
growth toward an environmental carrying capacity, as in Figure 1.
A fishery is a geographical area where fish breed and are harvested.
A contemporary example that we consider is Georges Bank, an area off
the coast of Maine. Another example is the area off Newfoundland and
Labrador in eastern Canada, which was a fishery for Northern Atlantic
cod, until it collapsed in 1992 and was closed [Schijn et al. 2021].
A fishery has multiple competing interests. One is a desire to feed people
both today and in the future. At the same time, there is an economic interest
for those making a living from fishing. At first glance, the goal would
seem to be to harvest the absolute maximum amount available (assuming that we can determine this maximum amount). Such an effort might
damage the fishery in terms of reducing future harvests, which depend on
uncaught fish reproducing.
We ask: What is the maximum that we could harvest on a sustainable
basis? And how challenging is it to do so?
COMAP develops curriculum resources, professional development programs, and contest opportunities that are multidisciplinary, academically rigorous, and fun for educators and students. COMAP's educational philosophy is centered around mathematical modeling: using mathematical tools to explore real-world problems.